No such thing. Ask away!
-
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
-
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
-
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
Moderators
PieFed
Every time I recommend a show to my coworker he immediately looks it up on rotten tomatoes. It's kind of funny because he doesn't trust scores that are too high or too low.
Alright, I’ll bite. I actually swing by the rotten tomatoes for a quick half hearted glance to see if even THEY thought it was trash. If it’s trash to them on both of their metrics, I’ll probably mark it lower on my watch list. If it’s mediocre or higher I’ll go in with no expectation of greatness but at least knowing it may be somewhat entertaining.
Ok but like.. what media?
Just movies? I haven't read a review in years. I know from the trailer if I want to see it or not. Maybe I'll stumble upon a video discussing something about it and become intrigued or turned away.
I do seek out reviews of video games because it is usually a significant cost and I want to make sure it's something I'll like. Both print and video.
I don't even watch trailers.
The name, poster and 1 line blurb is what will get me to watch or not watch a movie anymore
Yeah, same. Trailers spoil too much
Nonsense, I love when I get the entire synopsis in 2 minutes. Saves me from buying a ticket.
Any sort of entertainment media, whether movies/books/shows/games/music, so you got it with your reply!
Social media.
You get a 3.6 you were at a 6 until this post.
I feel like I've whooshed something. I didn't know if they were including video games, TV shows, books, etc. or if they were restricting to movies since that *use* to be the default thing reviewed.
I think it depends on the product. In general, review scores that are "too low" in the opinion of people are more often the target of criticism.
For example, Nintendo fans in general will give massive backlash to reviews that are not 10/10 for Nintendo games, even if the lower score is legitimate.
On the other hand, IGN often is made fun of for scoring bad games too high. This is because publishers won't give review copies to reviewers who dont score their games highly.
This sounds like an anecdote, if anything. Nintendo fans are usually mad at Nintendo for missing the mark with certain games, not with the reviewers.
There's a video game journalist I have similar tastes to and trust for recommendations. Used to have one for movies now I usually listen more to directors for recommendations, never found one for TV. I usually get music recommendations from friends.
Even when I subscribed to Computer Gaming World back in the day for PC game reviews, I relied less on the review and more on what actual people I hung out with thought because a good game still might not be good *for me* but people I already know who generally like the same stuff as me are much more reliable metrics of what's good *for me.*
Reviews in general? No.
But people were never supposed to "follow reviews" generally to begin with. That's why Rotten Tomato's is bad. It's conceptually the wrong way to go about things.
The way to do it, is to check reviews for movies/games/shows you know already. When you find a reviewer who agrees with everything you think and seems to vibe with you, you can then trust that person's reviews. And follow their advice in the future.
Only double toasted. I find them hilarious
Gaming reviews, all the time. TV and movie reviews, never. I prefer to check those out myself.
Only after I reviewed the reviewer and confirmed that his reviews are up to my standards.
I check Steam user reviews before buying.
When I occasionally watch something I'll glance at reviews when I inevitably look it up on imdb, but that's after I've decided to watch.
Think a fair amount of people who do follow individual reviewers, but admittedly that's mostly based on what I used to do.
I only look at negative reviews tbh. If Im looking at reviews its because I already think it could be good and am interested. I look at negative reviews to see if I can save myself time or money by not persuing.
Not really tbh, I avoid them like a plague at this point. It no longer keeps me entertained anymore just like most things on mainstream social media.
Not at fucking all, I barely watch any mainstream media these days so that shit is irrelevant to me outside of letting me know a new dune movie came out.
Vs.?
Do you mean just online web articles, or YouTube videos as well?
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Simply checking out the media without prior research
Checking out the media is a search for me at least, so I'm still a little confused what you're asking about.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
How do you mean? When I say research I mean like looking up not only a description but also reviews (articles/YouTube/etc.).
So what I meant in my other comment was finding out about some media (including maybe some brief description) and then watching/listening/playing/reading it without anything more.