No such thing. Ask away!
-
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
-
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
-
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
Moderators
PieFed
Well, for one, the Iranian attack was a missile attack that could be taken down by anti air missile.
Two, USA isn’t exactly irans ally
You get *hours* to plot trajectories and line up a shot on an incoming missile or drone from those rsnges.
For a bomb dropped from an aircraft theres 15 - 30 seconds from release to impact.
Politics. US is ally with Israel but notxwith Iran, US isn't the world police but a country defending their interests which includes their allies.
I somehow hope, that this slow drone attack is also some political theatre like, *we shoot some drones to protest our embassy bombing, but we won't go further*
US politicians are unfortunate hostages to their bigger sponsors / financiers. Most of the players on both sides of the US political spectrum have been funded by israeli or pro-israeli contributors. We call Israel an ally, and that's a nice coat of shiny paint to hide the Stockholm syndrome.
Alliances like NATO or the EU come with non-aggression stipulations. You can't engage in warfare with an ally. If that ally happens to be bombing their own people, that would only allow for intervention if it was written into the accords signed by the nations in the alliance (hint: it's not).
Now, if Israel started bombing Italy, for example, that would not only allow for an intervention; it would require one.
What everyone else said, but also Iran probably informed the US through an intermediary when they are going to launch from where they're going to launch and what the trajectories were going to be.
This would allow them to have their proportional response, but also de-escalate with the US, allowing them to shoot it all down, and at least from the US's perspective prevent upward escalation
If that's true that's actually fucking hilarious
"Look man we gotta make this look legit or else my wife is gonna be SO MAD at me."
That's what MAD was about all this time
you have no idea how much that happens with foreign policy. it's not about right or wrong when it comes to foreign policy. countries don't have friends or morals they have interests both international and domestic. That can change on a dime.
There’s two answers that are both legitimate.
The first is that we don’t have any sort of defensive weapons between Israel and Gaza. To intercept missiles/bombs/whatever
Stuff like the Phalanx and RIM-116 at sea; or C-RAM (technically it’s the “land based phalanx system”…. But there are some critical difference in radar and the munitions it uses.
The second answer is that the US navy hasn’t been ordered to. They haven’t been ordered to because their civilian leadership is 100% okay with Israel bombing the fuck out of Gaza. Yes, that includes Biden.
They're not powerless, but unwilling to use their power against an ally.
Nations are perhaps the best example of “do as I say, not as I do.” The ethics you and I live our lives by have no place in international politics.
I think you know exactly why.
The US needs an extreme clean up in the government. Unfortunately, it's going to be harder to do every election that it doesn't happen
The wrong assumption you're making is that Israel is blowing up hospitals.
You're probably thinking about the blast in Al-Ahli Hospital in October, that was ruled by both the US and most news agencies as a failed Islamic Jihad launch.
Two volunteer doctors working with Doctors Without Borders were killed by a direct hit from an Israeli airstrike on Al Awda hospital back in November, so that's at least one example.
https://www.msf.ie/article/msf-doctors-killed-strike-al-awda-hospital-northern-gaza
Nope. Israel is targeting hospitals
They really don’t care
The justification is that there targeting Hamas and that Hamas is using every hospital, school, mosque and other typical safe-haven as bases of operations.
(Boy does Hamas have a lot of bases!)
You're right about that specific hospital, but it's not the only one that was involved in the conflict.
Why would US give Hamas more reasons to use hospitals as military bases?
There are no more hospitals in Gaza (because Israel destroyed every single one). And they have yet to show any evidence of Hamas using the hospitals as military bases.
It might have actually encouraged the use of hospital resources for millitary aims, because now that the hospitals can't use them, it's come out that Hamas is moving the hostages in commandeered ambulances.
Israel literally incentivized and made more possible the war crime they claimed they were trying to punish Hamas for committing in the first place.
Oh ho ho, you innocent child you. Sit down and allow me to tell you a story. It starts many decades ago and involves a Prince, some angry free thinkers, JFK, Anna Nicole Smith, and a smaaaaall aubergine 🍆.