Bluesky is a small indie company. It can't afford to fight the law or implement the extensive age verification the law requires. So it chose to pull the plug and leave.
FB, X, etc, have a lot more resources to implement the extensive, invasive age verification Mississippi requires and keep fighting it in court until the decision upholding it is final.
Tbh my first thought was “ehh people can just vpn around it then” which is basically just saying its easily circumventable and i know no instance of legal issues for those that do.
Still a net negative for that state though and the more laws and circumvemtion becomes more common the more people are thrown into the precarius class (see immigrants in the US now).
Why would it affect their bottom line other than positively? Corporations love fascism because it can make it mandatory for people to buy from them, among other things.
PieFed
Nemeski
Share on Mastodon
Share on Reddit
Share on WhatsApp
Have any of Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord implemented age-checks in Mississippi then?
If not, why is Bluesky the only one going dark there?
Because Bluesky isn't a real decentralized platform
Yeah but why aren't the other sites implementing checks?
Money.
They will
🤝🙂↕️
嘘！
There are other Appviews on the atProto that have chosen not to implement checks that have full access to Bluesky posting/data.
Bluesky is a small indie company. It can't afford to fight the law or implement the extensive age verification the law requires. So it chose to pull the plug and leave.
FB, X, etc, have a lot more resources to implement the extensive, invasive age verification Mississippi requires and keep fighting it in court until the decision upholding it is final.
I'm of the opinion that even if it is final, at some points laws are so ridiculous they must cease to be effective for all.
Lol .... US law is becoming less and less relevant or meaningful as time goes on
Tbh my first thought was “ehh people can just vpn around it then” which is basically just saying its easily circumventable and i know no instance of legal issues for those that do.
Still a net negative for that state though and the more laws and circumvemtion becomes more common the more people are thrown into the precarius class (see immigrants in the US now).
> implying those neofash sites would fight against orders to tHiNk Of thE cHiLdReN
They will if tHiNkInG oF the ChiLdReN threatens to meaningfully affect their bottom line
Why would it affect their bottom line other than positively? Corporations love fascism because it can make it mandatory for people to buy from them, among other things.