Back to main discussion
Quite the stretch. There really isn’t any comparison to be done between a war of foreign aggression and a civil war in this context. Also didn’t the US allow a third time for Roosevelt during WWII for much the same reasons?
Quite the stretch. There really isn’t any comparison to be done between a war of foreign aggression and a civil war in this context.
As I said elsewhere, the effect of denying the centralized government the ability to offer elections in occupied territory is the same.
Also didn’t the US allow a third time for Roosevelt during WWII for much the same reasons?
There was no law at the time limiting the number of terms presidents could win.
Local votes are a bit more private.
Default mode: public.
Quite the stretch. There really isn’t any comparison to be done between a war of foreign aggression and a civil war in this context. Also didn’t the US allow a third time for Roosevelt during WWII for much the same reasons?
As I said elsewhere, the effect of denying the centralized government the ability to offer elections in occupied territory is the same.
There was no law at the time limiting the number of terms presidents could win.