EU Commission bans top officials from using Signal groups

submitted by

www.heise.de/en/news/EU-Commission-bans-top-off…

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/61888435

27
121
3

Back to main discussion

Anyone wana give the tl:dr?

Why?

 reply
24

The decision was made according to the report after the Commission became aware of the group’s existence last month and deemed the risk of compromise too high. While there is no evidence yet that communication has actually been intercepted, the threat situation has escalated.

 reply
25

So… Not because “that’s a privacy tool, conducting public business there is antidemocratic”.

Instead because, “look at how those Americans use it wrongly, we don’t want to be like them.”

…

Huh. I have mixed feelings about this.

 reply
22

No not really. More a “its not the right tool for the job” signal is a messenger for private use, EU is working on / has a matrix based messenger that is more suited.

You still want encryption but also central user management etc. (Which hopefully also includes archiving…).

 reply
30

Sounds like a decentralized encrypted messaging platform is needed.

And when you need the highest trust, you just need to make sure you and the people you are talking to are all on trusted servers.

so governments would use their own gov.eu server or something, and only communicate sensitive info to others on that network so the info never leaves that server

 reply
6

Yes. Something they are working on based on Matrix ;)

 reply
5

Sounds great, I didn’t know about that

 reply
2

Sounds like a decentralized encrypted messaging platform is needed.

Decentralized probably isn’t desirable for this use case; self-hosted is. When designing something for that purpose based on a decentralized protocol like Matrix, it’s probably desirable to mandate that the most sensitive conversations take place using a server with decentralization disabled and a client restricted to using only that server.

 reply
2

US American servers.

 reply
14
Insert image