Flawed economic models mean climate crisis could crash global economy, experts warn
www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/05/fla…
20 Comments
Comments from other communities
Wot. That was always what was going to happen.
Scientists have been told to hold back on the claims because they are to extreme to be accepted… everyone’s been fighting over the very unlikely best scenario and the greedy monsters cannot even let that be. We are doomed. Shame those responsible will enjoy the apocalypse more than their victims (everyone else).
Execute the luigi protocol please.
Not the economy!
Another name for mass famine, and the resulting population crash.
Economic crashes are something we can relate to, unfortunately.
Deleted by moderator
Total economic collapse may actually be what it takes to save us as a species.
Deleted by moderator
I’m not sure those are mutually exclusive.
The “well akshully” aside. I agree.
Deleted by moderator
Internet trope of nerd/pedant correcting someone by starting off “well actually”.
I’ve been exposed to excessive internetting.
we can’t bail out the Earth like we did the banks.
ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
PieFed
Share on Mastodon
I’m reminded of this article
https://theintercept.com/2023/10/29/william-nordhaus-climate-economics/
Any economic system that doesn’t have ecology as the base can only be rubbish
Models are useless things for economic forecasting
"The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable." — Ezra Solomon, professor of finance, Stanford University
If you have never seen these lectures by Economist Steve Keen, they are well worth watching.
This one he delivered at Nordhaus’ home university: https://youtu.be/QGfaqALkc40
A deep dive into the shockingly bad “economics” that was used to inform policy: https://youtu.be/aoFiw2jMy-0
(He eviscerates Nordhaus starting at 25-30min continuing.)
(At, 47min, he goes over Nordhaus’ Nobel prize lecture wherehe claims 4° of warming would be “optimal").
So, Nordhaus has to be one of the most interesting bastards of history. It seems like he came into prominance FIRST by publically attacking the Limits to Growth study.
The Limits to Growth study was the first major attempt to use a computer model to study the complex system that is the economy-environment. People had never really done computer models before this.
Nordhaus basically argued against this study and said that the market will solve the problems. But basically, if you do a deep dive on his argument, he failed to understand the computer model or the fact that it was a complex system. It kind of went over his head.
THEN, a few years later, he does his own extremely similar study using extremely similar methods and wins the Nobel Prize in Economics. Like at some point he grasped the idea of Limits to Growth, then totally rips off and plagiarizes their approach. He feeds in some junk data and makes his model prove that we live in a cornucopian economic world.
And THEN, people in policy positions listened to him.
Nordhaus is not just some economist, he’s actually evil.