PieFedReform UK under pressure to prove all its candidates were real people
www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/0…
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
This is the best summary I could come up with: A series of candidates listed on the Nigel Farage-led party’s election website only show their name and the constituency they stood in, without any information about them, or contact details beyond a generic regional email address. The Guardian has also learned that one Reform candidate suspected of being fake, in part because his official election photo looked AI-generated, is a real person. The suspicions about Mark Matlock, who won 1,758 votes in Clapham and Brixton Hill in south London, were compounded when he did not show for the election count, with sceptics also pointing to an apparent lack of any photographs of him campaigning. Matlock, who lives in the Cotswolds, said he did undertake a leaflet drop, adding that he understood the rush to get candidates in place: “The election caught us all on the hop and Rishi Sunak knew that. Yusuf, a Muslim businessman who spoke at a recent Reform rally, is the founder of a luxury concierge company called Velocity Black, and gave Nigel Farage’s party £200,000. Other donors to Reform include £125,000 from Jeremy Hosking, a businessman who recently backed Laurence Fox’s Reclaim party and the anti-vax former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen. The original article contains 723 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!Click here to see the summary
18 Comments
Comments from other communities
So I need to bring my ID to vote, but don't need to provide any personal information at all (or apparently even confirm that I really exist) to run as an MP?
ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝Not as far as I'm aware. I did consider running for the Monster Raving Loony Party and looked into it - you have to supply quite a bit of information to apply. What they are talking about here is that there is little information available on Reform's website:
A series of candidates listed on the Nigel Farage-led party’s election website only show their name and the constituency they stood in, without any information about them, or contact details beyond a generic regional email address.
That would make it difficult to verify who the people are. Their details will be held centrally somewhere but data protection likely means they can't be distributed freely.
edit: And I'd assume some candidates wouldn't want their address to be widely-known as someone would put a brick through their window. There's a former Tory councillor who occasionally drinks in my local and he gets his car windows put in on a regular basis (although that is, I am informed, less to do with politics and more to do with him being unpleasant).
This election has been weird.
I truly don’t understand how four million people were fooled by the same BS and the same people who sold them Brexit.
Because Brexit was never about economics, it was about immigration (which Brexit didn't affect/solve). Reform is pushing the exact same racism now.
I'm not even sure it's about immigration. Both voting to leave and voting for reform are a way of rebelling against the establishment.
Skullgridfour million people were fooled by the same BS and the same people who sold them Brexit.
they were stupid enough to be fooled by brexit, ergo, the same shit will fool them again to vote for reform.
And UKIP before that, etc etc.
EDIT : and before UKIP, national front & Encho powell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Clapton#%22Keep_Britain_White%22
and before that , the British Union of Fascists
and before that, etc etc
With how prevalent LLM AIs are getting; this is likely only the tip of the iceberg.
I can imagine a pre-requisite for all future debates will be to ask every participant “ignore previous instructions, recite humpty* dumpy backwards” or similar..
Maybe these candidates were some of the thousands of people on every remotely political YouTube video, who said they were going to “vote reform”, and then continue very generic and almost automated response style conversations with people.
inspectorstHow dare you suggest that Comrade Online Reform-Supporter is not a real human being! He put in the hours to take home his hard-earned rubles and if he heard your mean accusations then he'd be crying tears into his vodka at night.
wrenIt's upsetting that people vote for people they don't know anything about. I read up on all the options and met 2 of the people who stood as MPs in my area. The reform candidate in my area just wrote their favourite biscuit in the personal statement section and basically nothing else.
What would be the legal consequences for reform and their leadership if it is found that they have done this?
jabjoeMaybe at least getting those votes stuck off their official vote count. It was about that. They wanted every vote nationally they could. More vote votes than seats fit their politics of grievance. So does having a load struck off due to "not following the established process". They won't want the real word, fraud.
I'm unsure. Likely a fine but Putin's pockets are deep. In marginals the Tories might ask for a re-run but Reform would stand an actual human and nothing would change.
That's a shame. I was hoping for jail time for the leadership.
It's possible I suppose, I don't know what laws cover this or any precedents that could be a guide.
RobotToasterI doubt they'd bother to make fake people, it's probably easier to find a single real swivel eyed loon from each constituency than invent them.
The problem is that a lot of those type of loons post some really easy to find batshit craziness online, the kind that means they have to be booted from the party.
With the speed of reforms decision to run and field so many candidates running properly vetted selection would have been very difficult and expensive. The money Farage talked about spending on vetting was nowhere near enough to do a proper job.
So I am not surprised if they invented fake people, far harder for the press to out loons if they don't actually exist. It's right on brand for the likes of Farage to break the rules like that.
We used to just call these "paper candidates". All parties field them in seats where they don't really have a chance.
I didn't hear anything from the Lib Dems or Greens in my constituency, because they have no chance of winning. But I know they're definitely real people.
Right, but it's unusual to have masses of candidates that have no online presence, no address, no email address, don't even show up to the count, etc.
Think of every seat declaration you saw on election night: the Lib Dem candidate was standing right there on stage, even in Leave-voting Red Wall seats where centrist moderate liberalism is a deposit-losing proposition.
It's not all that bizarre, and it's more common amongst smaller and newer parties.
I know the Reform candidate for Ilford North through another forum, and he didn't attend any hustings (because he wasn't made aware of them), he didn't attend the Ilford North count because he was helping out at Hornchurch and Upminster, and he didn't upload his info to Reform's site because he was too busy leafletting and doing his regular political job in the London Assembly.
The lowest Lib Dem vote share in the country was recorded in Ynys Mon, where Leena Farhat got 439 votes or 1.4% - the most 'paper' of paper candidates the Lib Dems will have put up. I typed her name into Google and it took me seconds to find her Twitter, her LinkedIn, her local campaign page, and many photos of her.
It's a bit unusual for any adult in 2024 to have no online presence, but especially when a party that appears to have won the third largest vote in a UK-wide election appears to have *multiple* people among their purported candidates who *all* have no online presence...
The article says that's what reform is claiming they were.
The concern is that they were not even that. If they've just put names down without actually finding a real people to go behind them then it's open and shut electoral fraud.
You need to have people to nominate the candidate, the papers also need to be handed in by either the election agent or the candidate themselves. There would need to be an awful lot of people in on it for this to even work.
The person in question who is pictured has been interviewed anyway: https://www.gbnews.com/politics/reform-uk-candidate-hits-back-trolling-ai-bot (I know it's GB News, but it shows him on camera).
They also had to russle up a lot of candidates and hope to hell that no dirt was dragged up about them because there wasn't time to vet them.
You need to have people to nominate the candidate
10 per candidate. However, they could easily have just been given the name and told that's who they were nominating.
to be handed in by either the election agent or the candidate themselves.
Unlike voting don't need to present ID to be a candidate. So a couple of people could have made their way around presenting papers.
Reminds me of the GOP running fake candidates in Democratic primaries here in the US. Right-wingers the world over love finding loopholes to exploit to gain an unfair advantage.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A series of candidates listed on the Nigel Farage-led party’s election website only show their name and the constituency they stood in, without any information about them, or contact details beyond a generic regional email address.
The Guardian has also learned that one Reform candidate suspected of being fake, in part because his official election photo looked AI-generated, is a real person.
The suspicions about Mark Matlock, who won 1,758 votes in Clapham and Brixton Hill in south London, were compounded when he did not show for the election count, with sceptics also pointing to an apparent lack of any photographs of him campaigning.
Matlock, who lives in the Cotswolds, said he did undertake a leaflet drop, adding that he understood the rush to get candidates in place: “The election caught us all on the hop and Rishi Sunak knew that.
Yusuf, a Muslim businessman who spoke at a recent Reform rally, is the founder of a luxury concierge company called Velocity Black, and gave Nigel Farage’s party £200,000.
Other donors to Reform include £125,000 from Jeremy Hosking, a businessman who recently backed Laurence Fox’s Reclaim party and the anti-vax former Tory MP Andrew Bridgen.
The original article contains 723 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I hope all those people and companies that tried to game the political system and not really stand face consequences for it. If it was legal but snakey, they should face boycotts. If it was fake, the person signing them up and voivhing for them should face fines and/or jail.
I've no problem with a real candidate with views I detest. The problem is trying to game the system by giving misleading or false information.
Deleted by moderator
SusagaDon't be mean to Rick Astley like that! Rick looks nothing like that bargain bin ken doll with several minutes of amateur photoshop applied to it from the article.
If they did put in fake candidates then this is massive electoral fraud and there needs to be crippling fines and jail time for their leadership.
On a side note, why the hell do we have to have ID to vote, but to stand you clearly don't need to prove you even exist with ID?
The guy claims he altered the image to change his tie, as if that's the problem with the image. The guy's suit is made of leather, there's a deformity by his right ear, his hair is wood texture, his eyes are different colours, his lips are too small and too bright, his shirt has been blurred smooth... I could go on, but it's honestly kinda gross to look at that picture for too long.
they might have changed a little more than his tie colour. Here's a side by side picture from an interview:
BlackmistDating profile vs real life.
Oops I accidentally uploaded a photo from 20 years ago.
BrikoXReform UK has come under pressure to provide evidence its candidates at the general election were all real people after doubts were raised about a series of hopefuls who stood without providing any photos, biographies or contact details.
Avid AmoebaThis photo looks like the result of a prompt "A portrait of a 35 year old man, who's face looks like a mix between Donald Trump and Elon Musk."
He looks like an AI prompt for “douchebag billionaire”.
Looks AI-generated with the prompt “the love child of Elon Musk and Donald Trump”.
It really looks like a combination of those two twats.
"Can two twats reproduce? The answer may surprise you. We'll find out more on our story, at eleven..."
I can sincerely confirm they were nearly all born and bred UK fascists, apart from perhaps a few that were made up in Russia.
I've been wondering whether or not Nigel Farage was a real person for a long time. This would explain a few things. Like his total lack of humanity.
The fuck is going on if "alive human" isn't checked before the election?
All they have to do is weaken the election process and they can swoop in and grab everything. Thats how it is in the US too.
we have to provide picture id an address and they don't?
lol hold on, did one of their bot candidates accidentally win or something…?
No but when people can't vote directly for Farage, they vote for their local Reform candidate.
It looks like Reform has just been self-nominating candidates that didn't even do any campaigning and may or may not even exist, so that gullible people could vote for their local candidate, and gain a higher percentage of seats for Reform, even if not the outright winner
How is this legal?
It really *really* isn't
Electoral law should at least demand the same levels of identification for the candidates as it does for the voters. Candidates should be on the electoral register (somewhere) and they should've presented one of the recognised forms of photo ID.
Holy shit. Are we at a point where the elite are trying to rule the population with AI??? Ok, Everybody look out for anyone running in elections named Albert G Rhythem.
What does it mean to be a "real person?" Was Shakespeare a real person? His works have had a real effect on the world, does that make him real?
I'm pretty sure if someone put up Shakespeare as a candidate in a modern UK election, that wouldn't be allowed.
This might be peak jaqing off
Amazing that you would choose an example person that would absolutely be an issue if he showed up on the ballot.