I find it quite impressive that you feel entitled to dictate to me how you want me to post. You are free to post the way you want when you start doing so.
Edit: blueworld@piefed.world I am not proud of my reaction to your comment, which really hit a nerve as you very well understood. For me, the problem with what you suggested is basically the tone you used. So I thought of using a different tone myself and more words.
If you look into my post history, you will notice that sometimes I add stuff in the body section sometimes I don’t, for a variety of reasons. For example, when I consider the article to be short, usually I don’t add anything. Apart from that I am interested in the people who are willing to to read the article, and what I add is for them (archive link, the study that inspired the article, etc). I really don’t care for those who are too bored to make a click to check it out.
All these said, I believe there is room for different approaches, and I consider this to be beautiful.
I find it quite impressive that you feel entitled to dictate to me how you want me to post. You are free to post the way you want
when you start doing so.Edit:
blueworld@piefed.world I am not proud of my reaction to your comment, which really hit a nerve as you very well understood. For me, the problem with what you suggested is basically the tone you used. So I thought of using a different tone myself and more words.
If you look into my post history, you will notice that sometimes I add stuff in the body section sometimes I don’t, for a variety of reasons. For example, when I consider the article to be short, usually I don’t add anything. Apart from that I am interested in the people who are willing to to read the article, and what I add is for them (archive link, the study that inspired the article, etc). I really don’t care for those who are too bored to make a click to check it out.
All these said, I believe there is room for different approaches, and I consider this to be beautiful.
The strikethrough. Too petty of me.