Tankie debate lord, Cowbee, revises history that the USSR was never imperialist and that it was actually good imperialism, and denies the atrocities carried out by the USSR
submitted by
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/f143f85b-bf53-48d9-89e7-e5e148cdf8e8.png
PieFed
You found Blackshirts and Reds to be accurate? By my recollection, it was a ‘best-of’ tankie hits.
Fair point. I don’t doubt there’s some cherry picking going on. I mostly appreciate the book for its critiques of capitalism and US imperialism (but i can see how someone who is already aware of these things might then just see the book’s intentions as shilling for communism).
It similarly taught me about Kerala, formerly one of the poorest states in India, that has since grown its per capita income to 50% higher than the national average partly (mostly?) due to its strong Marxist organising. This makes me think there’s probably something “there” with communism as opposed to my prior beliefs that it was all BS.
I also now appreciate that there’s a lot of propaganda concerning communism that is disseminated by the West, so it is necessary to approach opposing information with a bit more scepticism. I’ll let this quote from the book do the talking:
By and large I don’t think I (or any of us for that matter) have a problem with communists, but with tankies. The ones that can’t keep themselves from defending imperialists, genociders, authoritarians, monarchs and racists because they do the single task of opposing Western hegemony.
No book will sell me on that!
Yeah, it’s not the critiques of capitalism I took offense to, but the slavish devotion to the Soviet system in the book, including some really bizarre attempts to paper over some of its most gruesome aspects.